<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fine Art Blog &#124; Art ActuallyFine Art Blog | Art Actually &#187; Tags Archives for  culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.art-actually.com/tag/culture/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.art-actually.com</link>
	<description>Art is everywhere!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:33:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Diverse Art Creators: Dual Interpretations Of Quixote (Don Quixote)</title>
		<link>http://www.art-actually.com/diverse-art-creators-dual-interpretations-of-quixote-don-quixote</link>
		<comments>http://www.art-actually.com/diverse-art-creators-dual-interpretations-of-quixote-don-quixote#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ayden Glover</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[painter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.art-actually.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quixote (Don Quixote) has engaged the minds of generations with his fantastic and entertaining escapades; he has become a unique icon all his own since the creative author Miguel de Cervantes immersed us into Quixote's happenings through a fantastic work of fiction by the character's name. Don Quixote is the ultimate optimist and the stereotypical romantic, and the tales of his adventures relate the follies of not being able to combine these normally positive characteristics with a strong dose of reality. It's not surprising that in time many well-known artists have chosen Quixote as the subject of one or more of their masterpieces.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of the most vibrant and spectacular made-up personas of all history, the unbelieveable figure of Don Quixote has become a virtual idol since Miguel de Cervantes first introduced him in his classic novel of the same name. Don Quixote (Don Quixote) is the ultimate idealist and the quintessential  dreamer, and the stories of his exploits relate the follies of not being able to combine these otherwise helpful traits with a healthy dose of reality. It&#8217;s not shocking that over the years several well-known painters have chosen Quixote as the topic of one or more of their masterpieces.<span id="more-118"></span></p>
<p>In 1955,Pablo Picasso made his well-known grayscale ink wash depiction of Don Quixote. The masterpiece is known for its minimalist style and unadorned constitution.  In it, Picasso uses hurried, dynamic brushstrokes in a flawlessly arranged style to give life to Don Quixote. Picasso Pablo shows in this piece that, in regard to art, simplicity can absolutely be much more.</p>
<p>He overstates the figures of both Quixote and his world-weary friend Panza, as well as those of their horses to show the incredible differences in their basic belief processes and underlying world viewpoints. Even with no prior knowledge of the two characters or the novel &#8220;Don Quixote,&#8221; it is obvious that each individual is the total opposite of the other. The spindly, thread-like lines used to illustrate Don Quixote and his pony put him high above the earth, suggesting a behavior with lofty principles and dreams. In contrast, the smaller, heavier figure of the tired Panza is created through the use of darker shapes and heavier lines, placing him nearer to the ground and suggesting someone who suffers from an hyper-realistic, possibly negative general outlook.</p>
<p>Conversely, we have an masterpiece &#8220;Quixote&#8221; painted by the well-known contemporary painter Toros a couple of years ago. Toros also presents a basic Quixote (Don Quixote), stripping down the image by simplifying it into geometric images with distinct borders comparative to those found in stained-glass pieces.  The form comes alive by the use of bold colors and textured obvious brushstrokes that add depth, lending the image an appealing tactile air.</p>
<p>With his casual and wistful appearance it is obvious that Toros&#8217;s &#8220;Quixote&#8221; is a extremely confident and true-to-life person.  In the scenery we observe the enigmatic windmill that Quixote famously jousted in the original  book, representing the folly of becoming too absorbed in unattainable feats of whimsy. The combination of forms and colors between Quixote and the windmill and other background pieces, assists Toros to depict the correlation between Quixote (Don Quixote)&#8217;s personal constitution and his perception of the world around him.</p>
<p>We can see how it is possible to apply two extremely different media and modes of expression to effectively illustrate the same individual personality and basic concept when we examine the two pieces together . Picasso does it employing a black-and-white, while Toros does the same through a style that involves the extensive application of very bright hues. Picasso Pablo uses imprecise shapes and forms, while Toros uses highly clearly delineated ones. However, both works of art convey a robust feeling of idealism, giving the audience a very distinct and accurate feeling for the character&#8217;s basic personality.</p>
<p>This specific information is prepared by a well-known writer of great number surveys on today&#8217;s artworks. You can easily meet Toros paintings on a on line site <a href="http://www.Gallery-2000.com/Style_Avant-gardism.shtml">Fine Art Gallery for Exacting Lovers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.art-actually.com/diverse-art-creators-dual-interpretations-of-quixote-don-quixote/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culture And Art For Children: How Does It Change Their Perceptions?</title>
		<link>http://www.art-actually.com/culture-and-art-for-children-how-does-it-change-their-perceptions</link>
		<comments>http://www.art-actually.com/culture-and-art-for-children-how-does-it-change-their-perceptions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>linds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingerpaints]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.art-actually.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Children are natural artists in a way, usually diving right into the finger paints and chalk with abandon, unafraid of what anyone will say about their finished masterpiece. They are future Picassos. They draw without fear, paint everything in sight, and believe that their painting deserves to hang in the front entry of the home [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-49" title="culture-art-children" src="http://www.art-actually.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/culture-art-children.jpg" alt="culture-art-children" width="300" height="224" />Children are natural artists in a way, usually diving right into the finger paints and chalk with abandon, unafraid of what anyone will say about their finished masterpiece.  They are future <a href="http://www.art-actually.com/learn-about-picasso">Picassos</a>. They draw without fear, paint everything in sight, and believe that their painting deserves to hang in the front entry of the home forever because it&#8217;s the most beautiful thing ever created. In a way, every child is right!<span id="more-48"></span></p>
<p>Art reflects culture, and culture influences children’s views of the world around them. If children live with beauty and stimulating images around them, they will learn to be perceptive to beauty in their world. If they are taught to express themselves through art, allowing their thoughts and emotions to be conveyed outwardly through paint, clay, pencils, or other media, they will learn to allow their emotions to flow outward in a healthy manner that benefits their surrounding family and culture. Certainly there is much to be gained by exposing children to art in its many forms and encouraging them to explore their own involvement in different venues.</p>
<p>There is a caution, however. Children can easily be overwhelmed by too many choices, too much material, and too wide a circle of opportunity. Their minds perceive a slightly smaller circle than an adult’s mind, and their exposure should be geared to feed their curiosity, not bombard them with more than they can take in at once. Every great adult artist was once a curious child. That’s a good point to remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.art-actually.com/culture-and-art-for-children-how-does-it-change-their-perceptions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Makes Something &#8216;Art&#8217;? Beauty Really Is In The Eye Of The Beholder</title>
		<link>http://www.art-actually.com/art-beauty-eye-beholder</link>
		<comments>http://www.art-actually.com/art-beauty-eye-beholder#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>linds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambiguity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.art-actually.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer to the question, “What makes something art?” can be as varied as the people who would ask it. To some, nothing can be considered art unless it is esthetically pleasing, such as a painting of a vase of flower one might hang in a dining room. To someone else, a piece must convey [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-33" title="art-beauty-eye-beholder" src="http://www.art-actually.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/art-beauty-eye-beholder.jpg" alt="art-beauty-eye-beholder" width="300" height="187" />The answer to the question, <a href="http://www.art-actually.com/art-beauty-eye-beholder">“What makes something art?”</a> can be as varied as the people who would ask it. To some, nothing can be considered art unless it is esthetically pleasing, such as a painting of a vase of flower one might hang in a dining room. To someone else, a piece must convey some meaning or insight in order to bear the title “art“. But what about photos of the Holocaust? Deep meaning is definitely conveyed, but esthetically there is no attraction. Or consider a drawing of a bumblebee on a rose: beauty is evident, but what is the deep meaning there? Yet, to still another person anything at all could be considered art if it was created for the purpose of bringing enjoyment to the person or people who experience it.<span id="more-32"></span></p>
<p>Past generations employed greater standards of propriety in many ways than our modern American culture dictates. Art was expected to convey not only beauty and meaning, but also nobility, respectfulness, and often an air of something to be achieved. Peaceful contemplation was a frequent theme in portraits, and rolling landscapes filled quiet halls with calming images. Today, artists embrace life’s realities with perhaps more artistic license, bringing a grit and sometimes an unsettling nature to their pieces. These may not always please every art show attendee, but they are truly art, nonetheless.</p>
<p>Art is a creative reflection of life, simply stated, and thus its definition is ambiguous. Perhaps it should remain that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.art-actually.com/art-beauty-eye-beholder/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

